My Wedding is Mine

Thursday, October 26, 2006

I'm leaving you for posh


I saw connlady's response to the last post and gasped.

three important issues:

1. the tomkat nuptuals in italy at some giant hotel (I'm not a fan).
2. katie:kate::ricky:rick
3. kate is besties with posh spice? what does that mean? how did that happen? Is she a scientologist?

other updates - kate will be wearing armani despite specualtion she would be in valentino.
It is also speculated that The newlywed Cruises will spend some time at Clooney's Lake Como pad after the wedding.

There's also the threat that the Holmes parents will not attend the wedding because of the scientology thing.

So Kate is with Posh and Cruise is with Clooney - something isn't right.

3 Comments:

  • At 8:15 PM, Blogger ms. AB said…

    do you think that the tomkat thing might just be another way that tom is flaunting his relevance? like starting his own production company after leaving wherever (warner bros?). it's like he's building a bionic wife by taking the least likely of the crowd (dawson's creek star?) and turning her into .... something.

    oh, yeah. if "kate" is not wearing the valentino then obviously it's up for grabs. get on that bride.

     
  • At 9:31 AM, Blogger vp said…

    I read a really scathing article that said kate passed on valentino because one needs to be completely svelte (sp?) - and she still has some baby fat that would be unflattering.

    as for the timing of the wedding - interesting that it coincides with the spin around his new movie.

    I recently saw on "the insider" (an even trashier version of entertainment tonight) that robert redford is denying all claims that he has anything to do with this new cruise movie. interesting.

    posh and kate are supposedly having a "secret meeting" in l.a. this weekend - if it's so secret why does everybody know where it's taking place?

    and what does it mean to have posh spice as your wedding planner? should I try and solicit sporty spice?

    and if katie holmes is the way you flaunt relevance than it's possible one is flaunting irrelevance.

     
  • At 10:40 AM, Blogger me said…

    i can t believe she picked armani over valentino for a wedding dress. not lady!

    i am so embarassed italy and george clooney are involved in this. i hope they might class it up, but there is no way to class this up. none at all.

    i believe it is fitting that they are besties. both beckham and cruise are completely overrated pretty boys. but at least becks embodied the metrosexual. what the hell does tom embody?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home